Lawrence & Lorsch - Contingency TheoryPlease choose whether or not you want other users to be able to see on your profile that this library is a favorite of yours. Finding libraries that hold this item You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway. WorldCat is the world's largest library catalog, helping you find library materials online. Don't have an account?
Organization and environment; managing differentiation and integration
Harvard Business School. Related Papers. Manufacturing job clarity 84. Degree of Structure.
As expected, sales people were more concerned with market subenvironment. Subjects Industrial organization -- Case studies. Business and Environment Business History Entrepreneurship. The E-mail Address es you entered is are not in a valid format.
Find a copy in the library
Comparative study of six organizations in the same industrial environment? They got all their data from interviews with top executives at each company. Researchtimespanof feedback 0. Would you also like to submit a review for this item. They define an organization as a "system of interrelated behaviors of people wha ans performing a task that has been differentiated into several distinct subsystems, adn the efforts of each being integrated to achieve effective performance of the system.
Paul Lawrence and Jay Lorsch. The contingency school postulates that there is not one best way to structure work or an organization. An optimum course of action depends — is contingent — on the external and local conditions in which an organization is inserted. This represents an alternative to most assumptions from scientific management and shifts attention of organization scholars beyond internal dynamics to the external environment of an organization. The paper is based on a comparative study of six industrial organizations and data was obtained via questionnaires and interviews with senior executives. The researchers compare the degree of integration and differentiation between subgroups in each company i.
The execu- data are accurate, and subsystems with either high or low certainty would have members more task-oriented interpersonal relationships. They theorized that subsystems with environments of moderate certainty would have more people in social interpersonal orientations, adn the efforts of each being integrated to achieve effective performance of the system. They define an organization as a "system of amd behaviors of people wha are performing a task that has been differentiated into several distinct subsystems, this means that their tives in the present study were from middle analysis should not consider different suben- and top levels. Cancel Forgot your password.
This content downloaded from It may be that professor in the Department of Business Ad- their inferences are correct. Those companies who manage to achieve high sub-unit differentiation and yet still maintain high integration between sub-units seem to be best equipped to adapt to environmental changes. An optimum course of action depends - is contingent - on the external and local conditions in which an organization is inserted.Data suggested that sales groups were more socially oriented, and production groups more task oriented. An optimum course of action depends - is contingent - on the external and local conditions in which an organization is inserted. Your rating has been recorded. Ultimately!
Ob- Marketingease of accomplishment viously, "only the top executives" in the organization however, if a researcher goes into a clinical Factor 4 study predisposed to support a particular Manufacturingease of accomplishment set of contentions. View Details. Jay Lorsch and Emily Irving. They were gether which yields this level of reliabili.